In class you will be reading or seeing a number of examples of well written pieces. As part of your homework, you are asked to read and evaluate at least 5 additional sketches here on the blog. Sketch Collections are on reserve in the TCA library. You may submit your evaluations here on the blog (preferred), or you may submit them in class by the due date (see Syllabus below).
How to submit here on line: Copy and paste the text below into a new document on your computer (so that your work doesn't get lost if you have trouble posting, and so that you have a copy of it in your computer). When you have finished responding to the questions below, come back to the blog and post it as a group member (if you've joined) or as a comment (if you have not joined).
Name of Sketch:
Name of Sketch Collection/Book:
Publisher:
Copywrite date:
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate this script?
Do you feel that it would work in your setting without modifications?
Do you feel it would work with minor modifications
(To honor copyright, it is best to check through the publisher about modifications)?
STYLE:
(Realistic Drama or Comedy, Farce, Reader’s Theatre, Radio Drama, Mime, Puppet Show, Clown, Stylized, Musical, Opera)
TARGET AUDIENCE:
(Christians, Unchurched, Children, Youth, Adults, a specific ethnic group)
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE:
Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced
STRUCTURE:
Does it grab your interest and make you want to see what happens? How?
Does it develop logically, so that the action can be followed? (inciting action, rising action, climax, denoument)
Does it reach a satisfying conclusion? How?
What is the playwright’s theme? (issue)
Is the premise believable? (what happens)
Does it have clear and adequat conflict? What is the conflict?
Does it appeal to the imagination?
If a comedy sketch, is it funny?
If a drama sketch, is it actually dramatic?
If a mime, are the stage directions clear?
If a reader's theatre, is it voiced well?
Is it developed in a fresh creative way or is it too predictable?
MESSAGE:
What is it about? What Christian truth does it reflect or set up teaching about?
Does it deal with one issue, or avoid trying to say too much for it's length?
Does it avoid answering its central question with platitudes and cliches?
Does it refrain from being too preachy?
Is it relevant?
PRODUCTION:
Are the playwright’s production notes adequate?
Is it possible to produce?
6 comments:
SKETCH EVALUATION FORM (1)
Name of Sketch: A Serf’s Tale by Judson Poling
Name of Sketch Collection Book: Sunday Morning Live Volume 6 ‘A Collection of 6 Dramas’ by Willow Creek Resources
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copyright Date: 1994
Personal Rating (1 to 10): 6. There are good dramatic elements in this piece.
Will it work in my setting without modifications? Yes. Although some of the jokes may not work on our local audience, I would say that an English-savvy Singaporean should be able to keep pace.
Will it work with minor modifications?Yes. It could certainly be spiced up with some Singlish.
STYLE: It can be done in a stylized theatre format portraying medieval England / China. The sketch is a comedy.
TARGET AUDIENCE: This sketch is obviously targeting Christians. However, it is suitable to address the issue of materialism in all age groups. I also feel that the sketch is relevant to pre-believers who may find a connection here in their busy lifestyles.
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Advanced. This has a lot to do with the intensity of the chemistry required of the 2 characters: Serf and Serf’s Wife. There is also much comic timing and miming required in this piece. The pace is fast and the sketch is best done in a different accent to transport the audience to the medieval period where the context of Serfs and Masters is relevant.
STRUCTURE: The sketch is predictable in a sense because the audience knows that the Serf is indeed heading towards trouble with his over-commitment to 2 masters. The drawing point is to see how his plan to exploit both masters is going to backfire on him. The plot does develop logically and all the dramatic actions are clear. The conclusion is rather satisfying if you prefer a more moral-of-the-story ending that summarizes the point.
The Playwright’s theme is on the topic of materialism; and how no man can serve 2 masters. The premise is believable as the plot focuses on how the greed of the Serf drives him to earn from 2 Masters even at the expense of his health and productivity. As for the Conflict in this piece, the Serf and his Wife are in Conflict with the laws of the land, “which says ‘one lord only’.” It is clear but not adequate enough. The sketch could be beefed up if the 2 Masters were to appear and make things difficult for the Serf.
The sketch does appeal to the imagination with its medieval context. As a comedy, the sketch is only funny dramatically. The lines are not designed to pull instant laughs. I feel that the play can be a little too predictable as the reader / audience knows that the Serf is going to be in big trouble in the climax.
MESSAGE: The good thing about this sketch is its appeal to the pre-believer with the message of materialism and for Christians; it is about Serving 2 Masters at the same time. On the whole, the focus is clear and does not avoid addressing the issue. It is also not preachy and relevant to Singaporeans especially, who can lead very busy lives.
PRODUCTION: The playwright’s production notes are adequate and the sketch can be produced easily.
===========================
SKETCH EVALUATION FORM (2)
Name of Sketch: Hungry Children by Donna Lagerquist
Name of Sketch Collection Book: Sunday Morning Live Volume 7 ‘A Collection of 6 Dramas’ by Willow Creek Resources
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copyright Date: 1998
Personal Rating (1 to 10): 8. The pace is great and the lines are wonderfully crafted.
Will it work in my setting without modifications? Yes. In fact, no changes are needed in a local setting.
Will it work with minor modifications? Yes, although I will leave this sketch quite alone.
STYLE: It is Realistic Drama
TARGET AUDIENCE: This sketch is relevant to many groups, e.g. parents, Christian young adults and children.
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Intermediate. The critical element to making this sketch work will be the pace of driving the plot onwards and the chemistry between the actors. There are many instances of interrupting dialogue and ‘spontaneous’ retorts to each other’s comments.
STRUCTURE: The sketch flows very well and it grabs you to see what is happening in this ‘Adams’ Family’ setting. The audience is going to have strong reactions (either delight or disgust) in the nasty remarks the family throw at each other and the ending is unpredictable. The sketch does develop but not so logically as we see character changes in the parents and jenny (the daughter). Everyone settles down to a nice dinner and it starts with cordiality but changes rapidly to careless family communication from nowhere. The conclusion is satisfactory as it leaves the audience (and Dad) with a moment to reflect upon their harsh words used in everyday life to their loved ones.
The Playwright’s theme is centred on poor communication skills, primarily on parenting responsibilities; and anger control issues. The premise is very believable because family members tend to take each other for granted and hurt each other without knowing it. It is usually in the family where the real self comes up. The sketch has conflict flying all over the place: Dad blames everyone; mum blames Dad and tries to cope; Jenny blames everyone and herself (she has low self-esteem). Only the brother has a positive reaction to harsh comments against him. The Conflict is delightfully crafted.
The sketch leaves little to imagination – being a Realistic piece of Drama. It is a dramatic sketch that has many deliciously funny lines woven into it as well.
MESSAGE: The Christian message is about the importance of controlling our tongue which can speak life as well as death to our loved ones around us. However, the sketch can be used to address many issues and this may be its Achilles Heel. There are many ‘side’ issues like anger control; self-esteem woes, gluttony and parenting difficulties etc. The sketch is not preachy and remains relevant to the end.
PRODUCTION: The playwright’s production notes are adequate and the sketch can be produced easily.
=======================================
SKETCH EVALUATION FORM (3)
Name of Sketch: The Warrior by Donna Lagerquist
Name of Sketch Collection Book: Sunday Morning Live Volume 8 ‘A Collection of 6 Dramas’ by Willow Creek Resources
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copyright Date: 1998
Personal Rating (1 to 10): 7 for originality. It is not easy to bring out the theme of Prayer in such a light-hearted manner.
Will it work in my setting without modifications? Yes. Many Singaporeans have maids and they may be humbled when they realised that there is something to learn from the ‘maid’ in this piece. Also, the issue of Singaporeans’ busyness is also very relevant here.
Will it work with minor modifications? Yes, some lines can be rather Americanized.
STYLE: It is Realistic Drama
TARGET AUDIENCE: This sketch is targeted at Christians who find it a struggle to sneak in time for prayer.
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Advanced. This is a monologue and the actor needs to be strong to keep the audience enthralled at the plot. Line delivery is absolutely essential here. The character has to be likeable for this to pull off.
STRUCTURE: The sketch has a personalised touch to it as the maid Marlene begins to talk to the audience as she is doing her chores. As she introduced new characters in her lines, the audience can be drawn into it because the characters are so interesting in themselves. The plot is not meant to develop logically but rather spontaneity is encouraged as Marlene talks casually with the audience by sharing her thoughts out loud. I am afraid that the dramatic actions are not easy to follow in this sketch but the actor can create them by herself. As for the conclusion, it is satisfying because Marlene has achieved the goal of making praying sound uncomplicated and can be woven into our daily chores.
The Playwright’s theme is focused on prayer of Christians or lack thereof. The premise is believable as we all need to complete our household chores or have a maid to do so for us. However, I do not think that there is much conflict in this piece. For a brief moment (presumably the climax of the play), Marlene did have a bit of internal conflict by lamenting how tough it is to keep praying for someone but that is it.
The sketch does encourage the audience to imagine the characters whom Marlene is fervently praying for. The sketch’s strong point is its fresh and creative way used to address the praying lives of Christians.
MESSAGE: The Christian message is about taking God with you throughout the day on prayer. The sketch deals with only one issue but with so many different characters introduced, the length may be a tad too long. It does not come across as being preachy and is relevant to a Christian audience.
PRODUCTION: The playwright’s production notes are adequate and the sketch can be produced easily.
=====================================
SKETCH EVALUATION FORM (4)
Name of Sketch: The Warrior by Donna Lagerquist
Name of Sketch Collection Book: Sunday Morning Live Volume 9 ‘A Collection of 6 Dramas’ by Willow Creek Resources
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copyright Date: 1998
Personal Rating (1 to 10): 7 for provoking strong emotional identification with the audience.
Will it work in my setting without modifications? Yes. There are always going to be hurting loved ones whom we have no time for.
Will it work with minor modifications? Yes, although it is fine as it is.
STYLE: It is Realistic Drama
TARGET AUDIENCE: This sketch is targeted at Christians who find it a struggle to sneak in time for prayer.
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Advanced. The sketch needs some strong emotional expressions by the actors.
STRUCTURE: The sketch does grab your interest as we begin to find out what really is happening to Lisa when her ‘concerned’ sister Betsy swings by with a pizza. She seems to be in quite a mess but the audience knows that the superficial part of her problem is going to expose more underlying struggles. It develops logically with a clear exposition, followed by inciting action, rising action, climax and denouement. The sketch reaches a satisfying conclusion because Lisa was right all along about the ‘concern’ her family has for her. There is always going to be a great deal of satisfaction once a ‘villain’ is exposed in the end.
The Playwright’s theme is focused on how we try to ‘sugar-coat’ everything and belittle struggles that others have. The premise is believable because the modern society has seen many couples living together before marriage. Perhaps this is more significant in numbers in the States but nevertheless, there are still cases in Singapore. It is also relevant because in our busyness, Singaporeans may neglect concerns of loved wants easily. The conflict is evident between Betsy and Lisa (not to mention being heart wrenching as well). There is much miscommunication between the two of them – Betsy tries to show concern in a way that she feels is adequate enough for Lisa but Lisa thinks otherwise and tries to link family history back to the current situation, drawing out scenarios of disapproval and neglect from the family all along.
Not much imagination is required of the audience, just immersion (I guess). The plot is rather predictable – you know the story but not quite sure how it is going to end.
MESSAGE: The Christian message is about handling old wounds and dysfunctional families. It can also suggest forgiveness and how all these old wounds can heal with the love of Christ.
PRODUCTION: The playwright’s production notes are adequate and the sketch can be produced easily.
====================================
SKETCH EVALUATION FORM (5)
Name of Sketch: The Story of Rachel by Donna Lagerquist
Name of Sketch Collection Book: Sunday Morning Live Volume 9 ‘A Collection of 6 Dramas’ by Willow Creek Resources
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copyright Date: 1998
Personal Rating (1 to 10): 7 for its unconventional way of telling the story.
Will it work in my setting without modifications? Yes. There are many poor homeless people in Singapore.
Will it work with minor modifications? Yes, some lines will need to be modified to suit the local context.
STYLE: It is Realistic Drama
TARGET AUDIENCE: This sketch is targeted at Christians of all ages.
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Beginner -- Intermediate.
STRUCTURE: The sketch starts off with the Park being the common motif between the 3 characters. It is fragmented and are about 3 women telling the same story from their own perspective. As the audience, you find yourself wanting to know what is going on in the park and how their lives are intertwined in the park. It develops with clear dramatic actions and the conclusion is slightly unpredictable but on the whole very satisfying.
The Playwright’s theme is focused on presenting three different perspectives about three women in a story. The premise is believable and it certainly presses on the audience to examine their apathy towards the poor. There is no clear conflict in the sketch but the sketch is filled with thoughtful reflection of the accounts.
The audience gets a delightful opportunity to imagine the park and the characters, especially Rachel the woman who is surviving on the streets. The sketch is developed in a fresh, creative way.
MESSAGE: The Christian message is about caring for the poor; and forgiveness.
PRODUCTION: The playwright’s production notes are adequate and the sketch can be produced easily.
Script Evaluation by Puay Hong – 25 Sep 2006
In class you will be reading or seeing a number of examples of well written pieces. As part of your homework, you are asked to read and evaluate at least 5 additional sketches here on the blog. Sketch Collections are on reserve in the TCA library. You may submit your evaluations here on the blog (preferred), or you may submit them in class by the due date (see Syllabus below).
How to submit here on line: Copy and paste the text below into a new document on your computer (so that your work doesn't get lost if you have trouble posting, and so that you have a copy of it in your computer). When you have finished responding to the questions below, come back to the blog and post it as a group member (if you've joined) or as a comment (if you have not joined).
Name of Sketch: Tired When Needed
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Sunday Morning Live Vol 1
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copywrite date: 1992
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate this script? 9
Do you feel that it would work in your setting without modifications?
Not entirely because the actor loves hunting as a hobby and there is no such hunting hobby in Singapore. Maybe can replace the hunting with golf or something else.
Do you feel it would work with minor modifications
(To honor copyright, it is best to check through the publisher about modifications)? Yes.
STYLE: Comedy
TARGET AUDIENCE: Christians
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Intermediate
STRUCTURE:
Yes, it grabs my interest and makes me want to see what happens because I am wondering how the main character is going to say “No” to this overbearing lady. Yes, it develops logically with inciting action, rising action and climax. In fact, it even has some humour within the dialogue.
What is the playwright’s theme? (issue) The theme is about christians who are over stretched in their involvement in too many activities. It is also the expectation of the others that
Is the premise believable? (what happens) Yes.
Does it have clear and adequate conflict? What is the conflict? Yes, the conflict is that one expects the main character to help out because he has always been helpful but he is too tired and burnt out to be involved anymore.
Does it appeal to the imagination? Yes.
If a comedy sketch, is it funny? Yes, it is funny.
MESSAGE:
The message is that one should learn to say “No” before one gets burnt out. Also we should not expect people who have been helpful to keep on helping and doing. We should get others to help out instead of the same people. Yes, the message is very relevant and it only deals with one issue.
PRODUCTION:
Yes, it is possible to produce it.
Name of Sketch: Prayer Group Therapy
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Sunday Morning Live Vol 5
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copywrite date: 1993
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate this script? 9
Do you feel that it would work in your setting without modifications? Yes.
STYLE: Comedy
TARGET AUDIENCE:Christians
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Intermediate
STRUCTURE:
Yes, it grabs my interest to know how the “prayer” will end. The story develops logically even though I feel that some of the character might not have enough to develop. The conclusion is quite satisfying as I think that it is not easy to end the “prayer”. Of course, I would have preferred it not to end this way ( but I do not know how it should end otherwise too).
What is the playwright’s theme? (issue) About how different people view prayers.
Is the premise believable? (what happens) Yes.
Does it have clear and adequate conflict? What is the conflict?
Yes, it has clear conflict between the different “pray-ers”.
Does it appeal to the imagination? Yes.
If a comedy sketch, is it funny? Yes.
MESSAGE:
I think it is very relevant as there are many different types of people – some who use prayer as gossip, some who use “big words” etc. It makes people think of the way they pray and their motives for praying.
PRODUCTION:
Yes, it is possible to produce.
Name of Sketch: Feeling Opposition
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Sunday Morning Live Vol 1
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copywrite date: 1992
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate this script? 8
Do you feel that it would work in your setting without modifications? Yes.
STYLE:Comedy
TARGET AUDIENCE: Married couples, couples in relationship
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Advanced
STRUCTURE:
Yes, it grabs my interest as it is a very funny sketch. It has a lot of “hidden jokes” with exaggeration emotion. I want to know how the whole story end. The ending was very unexpected and yet it is ironic.
What is the playwright’s theme? (issue) About how two different people view different things.
Is the premise believable? (what happens) Not really, it is a bit melodramatic.
Does it have clear and adequat conflicte? What is the conflict?
Yes, the husband is calm and has a sense of humour while the wife is very emotional. However the roles reverse at the end when the husband thought that the lawyer is going to give him a bill.
Does it appeal to the imagination? Yes.
If a comedy sketch, is it funny? Yes.
Is it developed in a fresh creative way or is it too predictable? It is creative.
MESSAGE:
It is about how two different people view two different matters. And how different people get emotional over different matters.
PRODUCTION:
Yes, it is possible to produce.
Name of Sketch: For Better or Worse
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Sunday Morning Live Vol 2
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copywrite date: 1992
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate this script? 7.5
Do you feel that it would work in your setting without modifications? Yes
STYLE: Realistic Drama
TARGET AUDIENCE: Married Couples
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Advanced
STRUCTURE:
Yes, it grabs my interest and I would like to know how it ends. It develops logically. The ending is simple but realistic and touching.
What is the playwright’s theme? (issue) About different expectations of couples
Is the premise believable? (what happens) Yes, it is very possible.
Does it have clear and adequat conflict? What is the conflict?
Yes, the conflict is between husband and wife who wanted different attention from each other.
Does it appeal to the imagination? Yes.
If a comedy sketch, is it funny?
If a drama sketch, is it actually dramatic? It is a realistic drama which injects some jokes in it.
MESSAGE:
It is about the different needs and wants of a husband and wife. It is also how small actions can rekindle a marriage. Yes, it is very relevant as sometimes married couples take each other for granted and did not put in any effort to rekindle the spark in their marriage.
PRODUCTION:
Yes, it is possible to produce.
Name of Sketch: No more womb
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Sunday Morning Live Vol 2
Publisher: Zondervan Publishing House
Copywrite date: 1992
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate this script? 7
Do you feel that it would work in your setting without modifications? Yes.
STYLE: Allegory
TARGET AUDIENCE: People in general, maybe those who have fears in their lives
PERFORMERS NEED TO BE: Intermediate
STRUCTURE:
Initially it is quite interesting as I was wondering what the story is about. However half way through, I lose interest in the sketch. I was not keen in finishing it. The story is a bit far-fetched and trying too hard.
What is the playwright’s theme? (issue) About the many problems in life.
Is the premise believable? (what happens) It is not supposed to be real.
Does it have clear and adequat conflict? What is the conflict?
Yes, it has clear conflict. The twins are eager to be born but yet at the same time, they fear the unknown and the world.
Does it appeal to the imagination? Yes.
If a comedy sketch, is it funny? Quite… might depends on the acting.
MESSAGE:
It is about the fears of the problems of the world that people have. Even though it is relevant but it brings up too many issues.
PRODUCTION:
Yes, it is possible to produce.
Name of Book : Sermons Alive ! 52 short dramatic sketches for Sunday worship
Actually I started reading this book first but I find it very boring after reading a few sketches so I decided to change to reading “Sunday Morning Live”.
Thought I just mentioned a few which I think is not good at all:
• The Greatest Bowl Game of All – Life
• $325
“Raising a Dad” is not too bad even though I thought the dialogue could be more interesting and engaging. The idea is interesting as most often we hear parents complaining about raising children. This is about 2 teenagers complaining about their dads as if they were their children.
My sketch evaluations - Rachel Eric
Sketch Evaluation #1
Name of Sketch: The Dream by Lisa Harper
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Drama Team Handbook by Alison Siewert & Others
Publisher: InterVarsity Press
Copywrite Date: 2003
Style: Reader’s Theatre? (This I have to check out)
Target Audience: African American Youth/Young Adults, Christians or Non-Christians
Performers need to be: Intermediate – Advanced
On a scale of 1-10, I would honestly give this sketch a 10! Well, my rating may not be completely objective. Being completely green in this craft, perhaps certain things that make a script a good or bad one may escape me. But as I evaluate it with what we’ve learnt and from a standpoint of an audience, it’s totally got me hooked and made quite an impression in me.
Structure:
The sketch is about a couple, Jerry and Tina talking about their last date to a movie titled ‘Real Women Have Curves’ (exposition) where the Jerry falls asleep because the lead actress “…ain’t curvy. She’s fat!” (inciting incident). This leads to each character airing out (quite unconsciously) their internal struggles. For Jerry, it’s a struggle with lust and for Tina it’s trying to conform to a stereotypical image in order to be loved (rising action). The climax comes about quite suprisingly when Jerry, as he’s speaking, realizes he may very well be turning into a “playa” just like his father was and turns to say “God, help.” And Tina realizing she is worth more than looking perfection just to be loved and (reveals) she has let it go by shaving her head bald (!!!). The couple interact with each other on stage for the first time with Jerry seeing Tina head shaved and all, and saying with conviction “I love you”(denouement).
Yes, I was completely hooked from the very beginning; mainly due to these elements:
1) The outline of the sketch can be easily identified. The exposition, inciting incident, rising action, climax and denouement are clear-cut. This makes it so simple to follow the plot. Especially when it is staged so uniquely, with two characters speaking separate yet interwoven lines, showing separate perspectives on the very same situation/issue.
2) The dialogue though a recollection of the events/ narration of thoughts and feelings, were written with lines that are sharp to the point. The flavor of the African American culture is evident in these lines too, making it all so authentic. I especially loved how the interwoven lines beautifully (and at places humorously) compliment each other, making the entire sketch flow clearly in one direction.
3) Real. The entire sketch is very real. The characters are written so real. Real as African Americans. Real as human beings. As I was reading the sketch, I was so caught up in it because it was so believable. The young generation of African Americans and other ethnic groups, I believe, would really be able to identify with the premise, conflict and characters.
-The premise: The sketch is about a couple each ‘telling it as it is’ from their own points of view. They are doing so casually facing the audience. It seems like the audience is a friend to the couple, hearing each “side of the story”. A familiar scene? I believe most people has been in such a situation, hearing at least one person talk about their side of the story and what they think of their spouse/boyfriend’s actions etc.
-Conflict: While at the beginning the conflict seems to center on Tina’s dislike of Jerry’s habit of looking at other girls, later it sinks deeper into their internal struggles. Jerry’s inner conflict centers around becoming a beautiful person on the inside as he discovers that what he likes in a girl may very well be lust, and how this could very well be turning him into a “playa”. Tina is conflicted with the issue of conformity. Conformity to a certain image or look in order to feel beautiful and be loved. Once again a very real conflict in the day and age we live in where the images portrayed by media seems to indoctrinate a certain perfect yet near impossible stereotype or standard to reach in order to be loved, successful or happy.
-Characters: I finished reading the sketch feeling that these two characters could be my friends. Their strengths, weaknesses, struggles, quirks were so well voiced, you can’t help but feel drawn to them.
4) Surprise: The sketch really caught me with my mouth gaping open in the end. Never would I have imagined the character of Tina making a stand by having her head shaved. But then again, this made the conclusion all the more satisfactory. For me, this action conveys what words never will be able too…freedom from conformity, shedding of insecurity, truly knowing that beauty is within, loving and accepting oneself, purification and other expressions I am unable to describe.
Message:
The theme of this sketch, as I see it, revolves around the question “What is beauty…without substance?” It deals with these interconnected issues of conformity to what’s been stereotyped in society and accepting/loving oneself. Very relevant issues in this age of society.
It provides a Biblical perspective on these issues in a contemporary way. As I was reading the sketch, I could pick up principals on inner beauty as highlighted in:
-Proverbs 31 which explores a woman of noble character who “is worth more than precious rubies”
-1 Peter 3:1-8 nicely sums up for a woman that she “… should be known for the beauty that comes from within…” and for a man that he should “…give honor…”
-1 Corinthians 10:13 beautifully encourages that temptations can be overcome
because of God’s grace.
-Genesis 1:27 that assures us that there is only one perfect image and we are made “in His own image”. What’s so great about this sketch is that for it’s length it truly does “Show, Don’t tell” the above scriptural principals without being preachy or overbearing any elements. Perhaps a new or non-Christian may be unable to detect the Scriptural basis that forms the sketch. I guess this is where a pastor could do a good job of addressing the issues of the sketch through a message on the above or other scriptures.
Whether the end of the sketch (denouement) was cliched, I’m sure can be debatable. One part of me argues it’s shows too simple a solution to a real challenging issue: calling on God and shaving your head bald. The other part of me argues however, that these actions are exactly what they are. Actions- for the audience to realize that a solution is available. But they must act on the problem. And to a Christian, a first course of action is prayer of confession and help.
Production:
The production notes are limited to gestures/actions, lights out and how lines are spoken (interwoven). Perhaps because this sketch was written like a reader’s theatre-simple and direct. Thus the director and actors, especially the inexperienced, will have to consider other unspoken production details such as how the words should be spoken, do the characters move about, and if they do in which stage directions etc. This sketch is so simply written it’s definitely possible to produce. Perhaps with a bit of modifications though, to fit in with the culture here. From observation, I feel these issues relate well to the Malay and Indian communities in Singapore. With the dialogue interchanged with the flavors of their unique expressions and certain things mentioned such as hairstyles and name of the make-up cream, names of models or rap stars changed to suit the local context, it would definitely make an impact.
Quote is a section heading from Pederson, Steve, Drama Ministry: Practical Help for Making Drama a Vital Part of Your Church, Chapter 6, Pg119, Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1999.
* All Scriptures references taken from the New Living Translation, Metal Edition
Sketch Evaluation #2
Name of Sketch: Shhh! by Alison Siewert
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Drama Team Handbook by Alison Siewert & Others
Publisher: InterVarsity Press
Copywrite Date: 2003
Style: Comedy
Target Audience: Christians
Performers need to be: Beginning
On a scale of 1-10, I would give this sketch an 8! The sketch serves its purpose well to grab the attention of an audience, sustain their interest through humor and get them thinking about the topic of ‘Being still’.
Structure:
The sketch’s outline is easy to follow along:
It sees Carter joining his wife, Andi at lunch (exposition). Andi is focused on completing some work while Carter, though has said he would sit by quietly (inciting incident), tries to converse with her about everything he sees (rising action). This leads to Andi losing her cool and completely cutting her husband off at every sentence (climax). Finally, she finishes her work to realize that Carter has left for his office (denouement).
The premise: The sketch is about a married couple meeting up at lunch. While Andi sits down to complete some work, Carter approaches this time as social break. He is unable to “sit here and not talk…” to his wife. I think this premise is very believable and most folks would be able to identify with being unable to sit still for a long while.
Conflict: The conflict portrayed is between Andi’s need for quietness and Carter’s inability to be quiet. The conflict is clear but lacking in a sense as it is presented lightly with humor.
Pederson states in his book that “…if conflict is lacking, one needs to make sure something else will make up for it. In the case of Pulpit Talk, it is humor and high identification.” As I read through Shhh! While it is rather a predictable idea, it appeals to the imagination of the audience by its humor and audience identification (through the characters that are fleshed out very believably). These are the very elements that propel that sketch forward and keep the audience engaged in what’s happening.
Message:
This sketch written specifically to explore Psalm 46, revolves around the theme of ‘Being still’. For its length it doesn’t delve into deeper questions or Biblical references. It effectively illustrates the challenge of being still in the midst of so many things to see and do. Very relevant in this age of loud music, TVs in buses and the lack of much get away in city life. It makes you think when was the last time you just sat down and didn’t say a thing. The amazing thing is, it doesn’t mention the Bible or God even once. It shows rather than tells this idea very clearly (and funnily). I’m very sure that every time the topic on being still comes up, I will remember this sketch.
The end of the sketch (denouement) seemed to end rather abruptly, and left me wanting more. I guess I was expecting something more. I’m not sure what this something more should be. Perhaps because the end was a wrap of actions rather than a resolution, a message by a preacher addressing the issue the sketch surfaced would be timely. I believe this is the purpose of the sketch: to open this scripture up for an audience to get thinking about.
Production:
I believe that this sketch is written with such simplicity and practicality; it’ll work without any modifications in almost any context. Its production notes too are adequate making it a great comedy a drama team should execute if an opportunity arises.
Quote is a section heading from Pederson, Steve, Drama Ministry: Practical Help for Making Drama a Vital Part of Your Church, Chapter 6, Pg108, Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1999.
Sketch Evaluation #3
Name of Sketch: Parable of A Pencil by Robert A. Allen
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: The Christian Orchestra And Other Plays for Church
Publisher: Encore Performance Publishing
Copywrite Date: 1994
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate this script?
I’d rate this script a 7. It interestingly explores the scripture in a way a contemporary audience can relate to – A modern-day parable.
Do you feel that it would work in your setting without modifications? Do you feel it would work with minor modifications?
I believe this sketch would work very well in a church setting without any modifications.
Style: Allegory or perhaps even a farce
Target Audience: The Churched, Leaders of a church
Performers need to be: Beginning
Structure:
Does it grab your interest and make you want to see what happens? How?
The entire script, from its title to its end captured my attention. Although sometimes the long
dialogue lines found me skipping ahead to get to the conclusion. It sustains your interest by
humor (due to the exaggerations) and very creative and unpredictable flow.
Does it develop logically, so that the action can be followed?
Yes the narrator’s role marks the exposition, inciting incident, rising action, climax and
denouement, helps the audience follow the action clearly.
Does it reach a satisfying conclusion? How?
Yes, I felt the conclusion was satisfactory as it somewhat provided an answer to the inciting question in an honest way.
What is the playwright’s theme?
The theme revolves around this inciting question: (As stated in the script) Are we led by the Spirit or led by the desire to lead?
Is the premise believable (what happens)? Does it appeal to the imagination? Is it developed in a fresh creative way or is it too predictable?
The premise is not believable at all. The sketch is about a writer who deems the pencil and paper are pure or conservative writing tools. Thus he puts theological basis behind this and makes a successful gospel and practice out of it. Later he unfolds that his “facts were foolishness” but he’s rather keep them up for he feels his followers need them. This unimaginable scenario is the element that makes the sketch all the more interesting as it keeps one engaged and guessing.
Does it have clear and adequate conflict? What is the conflict?
The conflict, as I see it, is not apparent at all. The whole sketch is just one wrong picture!
Message:
What is it about? What Christian truth does it reflect or set up teaching about?
It is about so-called religiousness or man-made traditions of Christianity. It is creatively yet accurately based on Luke 11:46, where the pharisees are condemned by Jesus for their ‘religious ways’ which were lies and not Biblical. This sketch is an illustration of their ‘religious ways’ and lies.
Does it deal with one issue, or avoid trying to say too much for it’s length?
Though short, the sketch is written with such finesse, the issue is addressed clearly.
Does it avoid answering its central question with platitudes and cliches?
The sketch answers the inciting question in the climax without any cliches but with such honesty, it’s shocking.
Does it refrain from being too preachy?
The sketch definitely does not come across preachy.
Is it relevant?
I think this sketch will be rendered relevant to an audience when a preacher accompanies it
with an exposition of the scripture and relates it to real life situations that may raise the
inciting question.
Production:
Are the playwright’s production notes adequate?
There is hardly any production notes. More descriptions on how lines should be spoken or its motivation/emotion (example: confused, unsure, surprised) and accompanying gestures would be helpful.
Is it possible to produce?
It is possible to produce this sketch.
Sketch Evaluation #4
Name of Sketch: The Christian Orchestra by Robert A. Allen
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: The Christian Orchestra And Other Plays for Church
Publisher: Encore Performance Publishing
Copywrite Date: 1994
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate this script?
I’d rate this script a 5. While some elements make this sketch a memorable one, it was disappointing for me to find this scripture based sketch having hardly any link with its scripture reference (John 15:12). It seems rather aged or non-contemporary for today’s generation too.
Do you feel that it would work in your setting without modifications?
Do you feel it would work with minor modifications?
I feel it would work in a church setting with a few minor modifications. Perhaps the instruments mentioned could be interchanged with ones that are more familiar in our local context. I doubt many Singaporeans, especially common folk who don’t frequent the orchestra scene, would know or be able to relate to a cornet, french horns etc.
Style: Satire
Target Audience: The Churched, Musicians
Performers need to be: Beginning
Structure:
Does it grab your interest and make you want to see what happens? How?
Honestly, the script did not really grab my attention or interest. The dialogue and action
seemed a bit draggy to me.
Does it develop logically, so that the action can be followed? (inciting action, rising action, climax, denouement)
The sketch develops logically yet the inciting action, rising action and climax seems a bit too
mellow or even flat for the strong denouement. Thus while its easy to follow the action, I
found it challenging to wrap my mind around what was actually happening or where it was
going.
Does it reach a satisfying conclusion? How?
Yes, the conclusion was satisfying. It provided a bit of a reversal invoking emotion (of
frustration from me as the First Chair trumpet tried to turn his rejection into Alice’s fault). The
last line turns on the ‘light’ illuminating the main idea of the sketch.
What is the playwright’s theme? (issue)
The playwright’s theme is about uniformity and diversity in God’s work. I believe it’s trying
to get us to search ourselves if we tend to have a preference for church members who agree
with us or are like us in the way they think or do things.
Is the premise believable? (what happens)
The premise is very believable-someone coming down to join a Christian Orchestra and
getting into conversation with the person in charge. However it turns melodramatic as it turns
out this orchestra only has trumpet players and plays only for themselves and God.
Does it have clear and adequate conflict? What is the conflict?
The conflict is apparent though played down. The conflict of the sketch is the Christian
Orchestra’s high view of itself and its only instrument, the trumpet, as well as its
rejection/disapproval of other instruments.
Does it appeal to the imagination? If a comedy sketch, is it funny? If a drama sketch, is it actually dramatic? If a mime, are the stage directions clear? If a reader's theatre, is it voiced well? Is it developed in a fresh creative way or is it too predictable?
The unfolding of the script is really quite unpredictable; it appeals to the imagination and can
cause an audience to snicker away.
Message:
What is it about? What Christian truth does it reflect or set up teaching about?
This sketch revolves around the question of whether we are trying to build a church or
programme in God’s image (His way and His will) or our own. The question involves the
issues of uniformity and diversity in God’s Kingdom. However, it seems to be loosely related
to the scripture it’s trying to portray. I really couldn’t see a link between (the scripture) John
15:12 which talks about “Loving another…”as Jesus loves us and this sketch.
Does it deal with one issue, or avoid trying to say too much for its length? Does it avoid answering its central question with platitudes and cliches?
However, I do feel the sketch addresses its inciting question (stated at the beginning of the script) concisely and sharply for its length. The central question of whether we are trying to build a church or programme in God’s image (His way and His will) or our own is not answered or given a solution at the end of the script. The ending line is rather cliched but is apt. We are left with a negative yet impressionably honest viewpoint.
Does it refrain from being too preachy?
The sketch is definitely not preachy at all. There are no direct references to the scripture,
doctrines or the church.
Is it relevant?
I think this message is relevant to a church or a churched generation, at least as a reminder of
the fact that God’s in charge and not His workers.
Production:
Are the playwright’s production notes adequate?
The production notes seem inadequate. They’re only found right at the beginning of the script
(the setting) and at the end of the script (action, gestures). More descriptions on how lines
should be spoken or its motivation/emotion (example: confused, unsure, surprised) would be
helpful.
Is it possible to produce?
It is possible to produce this sketch in a church setting.
Sketch Evaluation #5
Name of Sketch: Path Lights – Part 1 by Robert A. Allen
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: The Christian Orchestra And Other Plays for Church
Publisher: Encore Performance Publishing
Copywrite Date: 1994
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate this script?
I’d rate this script a 6. While it is interesting, its relevance to the scripture cited is ambiguous.
Do you feel that it would work in your setting without modifications? Do you feel it would work with minor modifications?
I believe this sketch would work very well. However again, the relevance of it to the scripture
cited should be made clear.
Style: I think this is an allegory as it illustrates the Parable of the Sower (Luke 8 4-15) with
representations (such as light, stumbling block) that today’s society is familiar with (in contrast to a sower and farming).
Target Audience: Christians, Non-Christians
Performers need to be: Beginning
Structure:
Does it grab your interest and make you want to see what happens? How?
Yes, it does. The story moves forward quickly due to its short, clear-cut and concise dialogue. The premise kept me engaged and so did the character of Nasty Nasty. This character coming across somewhat animated was interesting and appealing to the imagination.
Does it develop logically, so that the action can be followed?
Yes the development of the plot seems to unfold naturally and was easy to follow along.
Does it reach a satisfying conclusion? How?
Yes, I felt the conclusion was satisfactory as it simply and directly got to the idea it was addressing. As just a first part of a series of three sketches too, it ends simply as a good introduction.
What is the playwright’s theme?
The theme revolves around this inciting question: (As stated in the script) Do we really believe that everyone needs the light?
Is the premise believable (what happens)? Does it appeal to the imagination? Is it developed in a fresh creative way or is it too predictable?
In a sense this premise is believable as it’s about a person handing out flashlights to help people see through the dark way. But with the character of Nasty Nasty, it seems to suspend reality, like being in a cartoon world where the villains are easy to identify. I felt it was a creative way of sustaining one’s interest.
Does it have clear and adequate conflict? What is the conflict?
Yes, the conflict is brought about by the character Dr. Masters, who though takes a path light
refuses to use it and thus falls, and ironically finds the path light all the more useless. The
conflict can also be seen as the absence of light. Its really quite interesting how as I looked
more into the script, the lighting became a character (God’s Word) in itself.
Message:
What is it about? What Christian truth does it reflect or set up teaching about?
The reason I’ve rated this script poorly is due to the fact that I couldn’t see how it relates to the scripture or inciting question. This part is quite confusing. As I see it, it deals with the issue of having a light and not using it. And thus being unaware of the darkness and (ironically) finding the light useless. I feel this stems directly from Luke 8: 16-17 instead.
Does it deal with one issue, or avoid trying to say too much for it’s length?
This is a short script as it deals concisely with the issue of being unaware of the darkness
around and not using the light (word of God) in hand.
Does it avoid answering its central question with platitudes and cliches?
Yes, this sketch didn’t answer any question. It realistically showed rather then tell its point of how people are simply unaware of the darkness about us.
Does it refrain from being too preachy?
The sketch definitely does not come across preachy. A non-Christian wouldn’t be able to trace
any Biblical perspective from the sketch’s action and dialogue.
Is it relevant?
I think this sketch will be rendered relevant if a preacher would be able to relate it with
scripture. This part of relevance is the major drawback of the script.
Production:
Are the playwright’s production notes adequate?
This sketch requires much co-ordination with stage lighting. Apart from stage directions, the production notes are quite adequate.
Is it possible to produce?
It is definitely possible to produce this sketch.
Sketch Evalutions-William Tan
Sketch 1-
Name of Sketch: Reap what you sow
Name of Sketch collection book: These Truth Were Made For Walking
Publisher: Lillenas Drama
Copyright date: -
On the scale of 1-10: 7
I feel that the sketch's settings would work better with some modifications, so as to bring more realism to the storyline. For instance, to have more counters and more people queuing up to have their transactions done.
Style: Comedy/ Reader's Theater
Target Audience: Christians/ youth/ adults.
Performance need to be: Beginner/ Intermediate
Structure: It has a rather interesting storyline and can evoke your interest to continue watching, desiring to know what happen next. Cause' they are not transacting money but of good and bad deeds.
However it does not build a high climax in the storyline. Probably, just a moderate one, enough to hold your interest in wanting to know what happen next. In the story, Mitch is so broke in his good deeds account that he has literally nothing to withdraw. The conclusion is nothing that shocking or fantastic either, its ending can be predicted.
The playwright theme is about reaping what you sow. The premise is not quite believable, though interesting. Cause' such conversation scene is usually expected to be seen at the entrance into heaven but not in a bank. Basically good deeds cannot be transacted.
The conflict is clear and simple. It is regarding Mitch's accumulation of good deeds in his account, apparently has gone empty. He has simply not done anything good to anyone or anything. Hence, when he wanted to withdraw some for himself, he began to argue with the bank teller.
The sketch does not appeal to much imagination. It is a funny comedy with expected conversation lines. The beginning of the story is fresh and creative but the ending is rather predictable as the story goes on.
Message: The whole theme is base on “reaping what you sow”. A lot of Christians do not bother to do much good things. They are more concern about themselves and their lives. It is dealing with one issue and it is not too lengthy or preachy. No, it does not avoid answering its central question with platitudes and clinches. However, the whole story's message is very clear and easy to understand, nothing that profound. It can speak to the audience very easily .
Production: The playwright's production is not adequate. I believe that more bites can be added into the story line and the setting. In order to bring more interesting effect and higher climax to the story. It can be produce after more modifications are done.
Sketch 2-
Name of the Sketch:They all want something
Name of Sketch collection book:The comfort zone
Publisher:Lillenas Drama
Copyright date:-
On the scale of 1-10: 5
It will not work without any modifications. Basically, the story is rather slow, draggy and boring. I feel that should be more changes to the whole entire script.
Style: Realistic drama/ Radio drama.
Target audience: Adults/ youth
Performance need to be: Intermediate
Structure: It is not an interesting story, and it does not makes me want to watch what happen down the line. It is rather slow and boring, there's no high climax in the storyline and the conclusion is lousy. Right from the beginning to the end of the story, both mother and daughter is arguing non-stop about irrelevant subjects. There isn't any strong substance in the storyline at all. The whole issue of the story is about the mother's selfishness towards people around her. She does not trust anyone except herself. She feels that everyone is trying to make use of her or wanting something from her. It has a clear conflict on the issue of the mother trying to defend herself from her daughter and Uncle Edward. Boring and silly though, but it could happen in reality. The story obviously does not appeal to anyone's imagination. It is a drama sketch, but not very dramatic. The sketch is not fresh or creative, but predictable and dull.
Message: It is about how miserable life can be if you are very self-centered and suspicious of people around you. I think the writer is trying to tell people not to be selfish but be more selfless and caring towards people around them. However, it is written rather draggy and long-winded. It tends to beat around the bush too much, that it drags the whole story down. It is not too preachy, but I felt that it is not able to carry the message out clearly. Somehow, it contains too much negative conversation and nothing positive came out from the mother's mouth. Hence, it destroyed the purpose of the message.
Production: The playwright production notes are not adequate. I will not consider to produce this script, unless it is being modified drastically.
Sketch 3-
Name of the Sketch: What a steal
Name of Sketch collection book:These truths were made for walking
Publisher:Lillenas Drama
Copyright date:-
On the scale of 1-10: 7.5
It can work without much modifications.
Style: Comedy/ Clown
Target audience: Christians/ children/ youth/ adults.
Performance need to be: Beginner
Structure: It is a rather interesting and comical story. It begins with an ordinary story of a burglar breakout in Vivian's house. How she went to the police station to make a police report of her losses. However, the interesting part is that her losses were all stolen items from hotels, office and restaurants. Instead of arresting the burglar, the police officers arrested her while interrogating her. The conclusion is satisfying and unexpected. The theme of the playwright is “thou shall not steal”. The storyline is believable and is happening everyday around the world. There are lots of petty thieves going on without anyone's notice. It does have a clear and adequate conflict in the story. The statement made by Vivian brought up a lot of inside information for the police officer to interrogate her. The storyline does appeal to one's imagination. It is a very funny and comical sketch. It is written in a refreshing way to entertain the audience.
Message: The message of the story is about “thou shall not steal” whether it is a big or small item even if no one notices. It deals with only one issue and it is not lengthy. The storyline is very clear-cut, fast, light-hearted and identifiable. It reflects on the present society whereby many people like to steal small items and not feel guilty about the entire thing. They tend to think its alright to take small items home and that no one will notice them. They think that these small items are “freebies” which is alright to take and go. But in the bible, the word of God is very clear when it comes to stealing. “THOU SHALL NOT STEAL”
Production: The playwright production notes are adequate. It is possible to produce this script for fun and laughter, incidentally, it brings a strong message across to the audience too.
Sketch 4-
Name of Sketch: What's my witness
Name of Sketch collection book: These Truth Were Made For Walking
Publisher: Lillenas Drama
Copyright date: -
On the scale of 1-10: 4.5
No, it does not work in the setting without modifications.
Style: Drama/ Radio Drama
Target Audience: Christians/Adults
Performance need to be: Beginners
Structure: Initially the story did grab my interest but subsequently, it gets confusing and it lost its climax. The purpose of the whole game show is not clear, you just don't know what is going on. The conclusion of the story seems so silly and nonsensical. I think the playwright theme is about being a witness for Christ. The premise is unbelievable, there wouldn't be such shows to question any Christians, regarding their spiritual walks with God. There isn't any conflict in the show, just some questions thrown at the participants by a panel of celebrities. It does not appeal to anyone's imagination. It is a comedy sketch which is not amusing at all but silly in many ways. It is developed in a creative way, but isn't creative enough to entertain and interest the audience.
Message: The message of the script is not clear enough. It deals with too many issues at one time. It is also quite lengthy but it does not bring forth any substance. Basically, the storyline is not relevant and it loses its appeal as a game show.
Production: No, the playwright's production notes are not adequate. Neither is it possible to produce this sketch.
Sketch 5-
Name of Sketch: The Ungrateful Smedds
Name of Sketch collection book: The Comfort Zone
Publisher: Lillenas Drama
Copyright date: -
On the scale of 1-10: 8
Style: Clown/ Comedy
Target Audience: Children/youth/Christians
Performance need to be: Intermediate
Structure: The storyline is moderately interesting and it does have certain appeal to make you want to know what happened. The storyline is simple based on a family called the “Smedds” who are rather eccentric and ill-mannered. The conclusion is nothing that fantastic or special. I supposed is the weirdness of the family which brought the story up. The theme of the story is about thanksgiving, appreciation and family. The premise is believable, it does happen in some families. There isn't much conflicts except that the father does not like the family to be polite. Not much of imagination is required in this funny comedy. The family in the story is written in a rather fun way but predictable.
Message: The message of the story is to be thankful and appreciative to the people around them. It is basically dealing with the issue of being thankful and how it can make people happy. The story is quite lengthy but due to the comical side to it, it brought life and entertainment to the audience. In certain way, the story is quite relevant especially when Grace Fuller came to visit the family. She brought a different attitude in contrast to the family's behavior.
Production: The playwright's production notes are quite adequate and this script is possible to be produced.
PH's quote :
"Yes, I really like this course and there are so many amazing things to learn. Just yesterday,I found out that reading and memorizing scripture can be fun and easy too."
RUTH's Evals
1. Name of Sketch: Hats Off
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Heavy Hitters.
Publisher: Lillenas Publishing Company, US.
Copywrite date: 1988
Evaluation:
As this is one of the short teaching sketches for kids, I feel that its objective of teaching on how we’re all the same is met. It is quite a fun script to work with; with minimum props. Anybody can be the casts, we just need the teller to be an adult to facilitate the whole sketch if done in the children’s church. An interesting part of the script to have audience participation that is to get audience to make wind noises. In my opinion, the message of the sketch is clear and it is fun to do with the children. However, we may want to change the style of speech to be more Singaporean. For example, the children in Singapore may not understand the word “geek”, thus we may have to modify the script.
Production Notes: Adequate
On a Scale of 1-10: 6
2. Name of Sketch: What Goes Around
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Sermons Alive
Publisher: Meriwether Publishing Ltd.
Copywrite date: 1973
Evaluation:
This is a short sketch on the fifth commandment – “Honor your father and your mother…” Exodus 20:12. The conflict in this sketch is that the woman, Peggy is concerned that her son seems to have loose respect for her. Even though it is not verbally express in the dialogue, it is obvious what the writer is trying to achieve at. It is not a comedy but yet not that serious. It reflects what parents and children are facing in their relationship, which can be easily identified by many. The short sketch will definitely build a platform for the pastor to speak on this subject.
Production Notes: Very good; included the characteristic of each cast, costume and props.
On a Scale of 1-10: 7
3. Name of Sketch: Whose Party?
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Sermons Alive
Publisher: Meriwether Publishing Ltd.
Copywrite date: 1973
Evaluation:
This is a short sketch with a powerful message behind. Started with a party mood and later change to a little solemn. The story of the sketch talks about the birth of Jesus. This sketch is suitable for all ages. The interesting part of the sketch is that it keeps its readers in suspend. No one of the cast mentioned about whose birthday it was until the end.
On a Scale of 1-10: 7
4. Name of Sketch: Keeping Tabs
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Sunday Morning Live
A collection of 6 Drama Sketches.
Publisher: Willow Creek Resources,
Copywrite date: Zondervan Publishing House
Evaluation:
In my opinion the author has achieved his objective from using this sketch to talk on the topic of either grace or marriage. It is easy for many people to identify with the character, Nancy. Many people in the world does not like to owe others any favor or in any way obligated to others. It is common to see people returning favor. Some people are even suspicious about others when they are treated well. Similarly, when God grant as His grace, many people tried to return this favor to Him by doing lots of stuff for Him without even realizing that all He wants is a relationship with us.
Another perspective which is used to illustrated on the topic of marriage that some people are so suspicious of their spouse if gifts were given to them by their spouse. They either think that their spouse wants something in return or have done them wrong. This sketch is really a illustration of communicating and trusting each other without reading between the lines.
I feel that this is quite an easy piece to handle, therefore actor need not be a professional. It is also quite a humorous piece of work.
Production Notes: Author did a good job in giving the background of the character. Props that are required are also listed.
On a Scale of 1-10: 7
5. Name of Sketch: Security Check
Name of Sketch Collection/Book: Sunday Morning Live (Volume 4)
Publisher: Willow Creek Resources, Zondervan Publishing House
Copywrite date: 1993
On a Scale of 1-10: 9
Evaluation:
I’ve enjoyed reading the above script. It definitely has the humour element in it. In my opinion, it is a good introduction to salvation or the basic Christian message as suggested by the author. It makes the very serious topic fun but yet with truth in it. I feel that this is a very good sketch for any evangelistic program. It subtly brings in the topic of Christ without being too forceful about, it is therefore set a great platform for the preacher. It helps people to think and reflect upon their own life. In my opinion, this sketch can appeal to the old and young. However, if it’s acted for the children, then things in the duffle bag can be change to things the children are familiar with for example good results etc.
Production Notes: Author did a good job in giving the background of the character. Props that are required are also listed.
On a Scale of 1-10: 9
Post a Comment