First Assignment: Due September 5
(second night of class we'll be discussing it)
After reading the Forward and Chapter 1 & 2 of DRAMA MINISTRY, by Steve Pederson, comment by quoting a passage that made you say, "YES! I AGREE!" or "OH, I never thought of it like that." (at least 1 sentence)
Then, respond to at least 4 of the following questions:
You can copy and paste this section below into your "comment" and edit from there, or first copy and paste into a word processing document on your computer to be placed as a comment when you've finished and saved your work on your computer.
CHAPTER 1
1. What did you learn about the history of theatre & the church. Would you like to know more about it?
2. After reading this chapeter, what are your thoughts about "entertainment" in the church?
3. Do you have a personal example of the power of drama to break down personal defenses? Tell us about it.
4. Do you feel that most believers are vulnerable and seeking to understand God and themselves when worshipping at church? What can be done to break down our defenses and get our whole selves more fully involved in worship?
5. Why does Willow Creek Community Church use contemporary sketches rather than Biblical sketches? Have you ever seen a sketch in worship that didn't "share the gospel?" What are your opinions about the Willow Creek philosophy?
CHAPTER 2
6. Do you agree that drama seems the "easiest" of the arts. Why?
7. What happens to the audience when watching a well done drama. Why?
8. Have you ever sought feedback or critique of your dramatic work. Did it help you? How? Why do people resist or not seek feedback? Complete this sentence: "A critique session is helpful only when you come away with some understanding of ________ ________ ___ ___________ ."
9. What does Steve Pederson mean by "Abusing the Art Form"?
10. How does the author describe Melodrama?
11. Do you agree that churches "hide" from the downside of life? Would you say that most churches are "addicted to playing it safe." What has been your personal experience with this?
12. What is your opinion of the "Less is More" concept?
13 comments:
I quote from Chapter 1, "Drama, [some people]... argue, shouldn't be part of a traditional worship experience because at the core, worship and entertainment are antithetical." This statement made me say "I never thought of it like that."
CHAPTER 1
1. What did you learn about the history of theatre & the church. Would you like to know more about it?
I learnt that drama in the church is not a new happening. It began as early as in the tenth century, when short dramatic scenes were used in the mass of the Roman Catholic Church. As this means of art gradually developed, it even extended beyond the church whilst the church still exerted its control over the bulk of theatre into the sixteenth century.
However, the relationship between the church and theatre was not all smooth going as the church often struggled with the increasing secularity of drama and made attempts to quell its activities.
I would surely love to know more about the history and the church as i agree with Pederson that much of the church today is once again embracing the value of drama as I am a fervent believer of drama being an immensely powerful tool of communication to transform lives. It also has the ability to stir emotions, evoke responses and unlock the creative mind.
3. Do you have a personal example of the power of drama to break down personal defenses? Tell us about it.
Yes, I do. I shall share a personal example from a different perspective. Pederson shares his example of his friend(s) identifying with a certain role in the drama and hence, remembering a part of his life that he had "covered up". Instead I will tell of how this drama impacted our team who were the performers.
In this sketch, the main character walks into town with her daddy while she heard a commotion going on nearby. She wonders why the man that her daddy said he loved is being stoned and mocked at. At the end, she kneels by the cross and witnesses that man's death and understands that she is the reason that He must die. (The title of the song we used is "Why?" by Nicole Nordeman)
After the performance ended, our team gathered in a circle at the back stage and most of us were weeping. We held hands and began to pray for each other and thanking Jesus for dying on the cross for us. It was an emotional time of praising and loving the Lord together. We were once again flooded by the greatness of Jesus' love for us and filled with reverence for Him because He bore our pain and shed His blood in order that we might be forgiven.
I hope that this is also an example or the power of drama to break down defences. There are more instances but i thought i'd share this as it is the most recent encounter.
CHAPTER 2
6. Do you agree that drama seems the "easiest" of the arts. Why?
No, i do not agree. I vividly recall my first attempt at playing a small role for one of the dramas in church. I only had to recite a few lines in one of our sketches. Not only did my whole body tense up, so did my lips. The words which i thought i had memorized didn't come out. Subsequently during rehearsals, whenever i concentrated on the words, the feelings didn't show and vice versa. It did not seem as easy as it looked.
Secondly, I concur with Pederson that the biggest obstacle to raise the quality of drama is the “lack of skilled leadership”. Being passionate about a something does not equate to being able to do it. Sometimes, watching another person act, sing, dance or direct may paint a false image that it is easy to do. Skilled leadership in a sense also means exercising much prayer and wisdom to carefully discern a person’s ability to take charge of the drama ministry. Without a capable leader and good guidance, even ‘world-class’ actors become of little significance.
Thidly, in comparison with the rest of the arts, all are challenging in their own ways but to label drama as the "easiest" of the arts is not at all justifiable. Let us compare singing and drama. The basic skills such as relaxation, concentration, imagination, memorization and observation are arguably present in both the art. However, I believe that memorization of words would be a lot simpler if you put a melody or rhythm to it, hence i can say that singing has a slight advantage over drama in this case, making it an "easier" art in a sense.
8. Have you ever sought feedback or critique of your dramatic work? Did it help you?How?
Yes. I usually present my idea and concept of the drama to more experienced people for feedback before i embark on it and gather the resources required. At each rehearsal, there would always be a debrief among the team before our final closing prayer for the same purpose. Finally, after the drama is finished, we would seek feedback from friends, families and other audiences.
Objective criticism collected will always be put to good use and i share the same thoughts as Pederson that "we end up learning more about the craft of drama when comments area less than positive." Most of the time, we just have to be prepared for comments that are not pleasant to the ears.
It helps me to be more confident of myself and my team's ability when positive comments are given, and at the same time, it constantly reminds me of the need to keep myself humble and recognize my areas of weaknesses. It might be due to the probability that rehearsal times were too short, or it could also be a communication problem between members that stifled our teamwork. Another common possibility is the fact that we did not give enough priority to prayer, both individually and cohesively and hence we were not united and strong spiritually.
Well, from there, we moved on.
Why do people resist or not seek feedback?
I quote Pederson, "Too often, I fear, our pride and insecurity get in the way, becoming hindrances to hearing and accepting valid critique." It is evident that there is a certain amount of pride in each one of us. We do not want to be put down because we are sensitive beings, it will hurt our pride. In another sense, we do not have or are not being taught to exercise grace when receiving not so positive feedback. It seems as if the world has programmed our mind to think negatively of such criticisms. At worst, if criticism that is given is hard and harsh, it crushes our self-image and causes us to think lowly of ourselves.
The saying goes, 'once bitten, twice shy.' These bad experiences could have contributed to the resistances people fence up.
Complete this sentence: "A critique session is helpful only when you come away with some understanding of the craft of drama ."
After reading Chapter 1 and 2, I totally agree to what Mr Pederson has to say about drama being able to stir our memories, probes our psyches and exposes our pain. It has the potential to create a “lump in the throat” kind of recognition. Perhaps something in our past, or in the present has been buried psychologically.
Chapter 1 ( Question 2 )
After reading this chapter, what are your thoughts about “entertainment” in the church?
With the increasing demand of reality TV shows, entertainment in church should also reflect the same truth and realism of God's word. With the multiple blessings Our God have blessed us with, I believe in total submissiveness in using all resources and abilities in blessing others and telling others about the Good news through it.
Chapter 1 ( Question 4 )
Do you feel that most believers are vulnerable and seeking God and themselves when worshipping in church?What can be done to break down our defenses and get our whole selves more fully involved in worship?
With God's grace and mercy, we can be completely free in Him. In this age and time, everyones sourcing for complete happiness, complete joy, complete wealth – 5Cs in their life, short cuts to eternity. But the fact is, when things start to go wrong, humans fumble and fall flat. That is the time when they are willing to submit completely to the Lord and are truly yearn to listen to what He knows and has to say about what would be best for them. They expect to hear His voice audibly, to have that “confirmed” confirmation. It is then, in that time of total vulnerability, they would worship him from the heart. Distractions happens all the time even when we're in the midst of worship, anytime and anywhere. I believe that there are worshipers that are totally vulnerable whilst worshipping, truly seeking God and themselves as well, without any motives in mind. Just purely giving Him thanks and praise. Drama or even arts in other forms, through the power of the Holy Spirit gentle as it is, come in a subtle way, convicting them of their hidden little secrets. Support groups/ministries provide support and encouragement for people who face difficulties in breaking down any defenses in terms of peer pressure, people who are overly concerned about how others may see them. Through it all, for people who have decided to put their foot down and decide to move on on a fantastic adventure in trusting Him. Let Go, Let God, LETS GO!
There is no authentic worship without vulnerability.- Chapter 1 Page 19
Chapter 2 ( Question 6 )
Do you agree that drama is the “easiest” of the arts. Why?
Drama is definitely not the “easiest” of the arts! In every other art forms, there would be techniques involved as well. In drama, the intonation and energy in the actor's voice and the message he is relying, is extremely important. The right words to say and when to say it, is also critical.
Chapter 2 ( Question 10 )
How does the author describe Melodrama?
Melodrama is being described as a play that is strong in plot and weak on character development. Emotions are exaggerated. In everything else, there would be a clear distinction of good and bad, right and wrong. Melodrama makes life seem simpler than it is, and when we resort to it, we fall prey to lying rather than being truthful. In melodrama, evil is always punished, good is always rewarded. The outcome of the plot would easily be determined / known.
After reading Chapter 1 and 2, I totally agree to what Mr Pederson has to say about drama being able to stir our memories, probes our psyches and exposes our pain. It has the potential to create a “lump in the throat” kind of recognition. Perhaps something in our past, or in the present has been buried psychologically.
Chapter 1 ( Question 2 )
After reading this chapter, what are your thoughts about “entertainment” in the church?
With the increasing demand of reality TV shows, entertainment in church should also reflect the same truth and realism of God's word. With the multiple blessings Our God have blessed us with, I believe in total submissiveness in using all resources and abilities in blessing others and telling others about the Good news through it.
Chapter 1 ( Question 4 )
Do you feel that most believers are vulnerable and seeking God and themselves when worshipping in church?What can be done to break down our defenses and get our whole selves more fully involved in worship?
With God's grace and mercy, we can be completely free in Him. In this age and time, everyones sourcing for complete happiness, complete joy, complete wealth – 5Cs in their life, short cuts to eternity. But the fact is, when things start to go wrong, humans fumble and fall flat. That is the time when they are willing to submit completely to the Lord and are truly yearn to listen to what He knows and has to say about what would be best for them. They expect to hear His voice audibly, to have that “confirmed” confirmation. It is then, in that time of total vulnerability, they would worship him from the heart. Distractions happens all the time even when we're in the midst of worship, anytime and anywhere. I believe that there are worshipers that are totally vulnerable whilst worshipping, truly seeking God and themselves as well, without any motives in mind. Just purely giving Him thanks and praise. Drama or even arts in other forms, through the power of the Holy Spirit gentle as it is, come in a subtle way, convicting them of their hidden little secrets. Support groups/ministries provide support and encouragement for people who face difficulties in breaking down any defenses in terms of peer pressure, people who are overly concerned about how others may see them. Through it all, for people who have decided to put their foot down and decide to move on on a fantastic adventure in trusting Him. Let Go, Let God, LETS GO!
There is no authentic worship without vulnerability.- Chapter 1 Page 19
Chapter 2 ( Question 6 )
Do you agree that drama is the “easiest” of the arts. Why?
Drama is definitely not the “easiest” of the arts! In every other art forms, there would be techniques involved as well. In drama, the intonation and energy in the actor's voice and the message he is relying, is extremely important. The right words to say and when to say it, is also critical.
Chapter 2 ( Question 10 )
How does the author describe Melodrama?
Melodrama is being described as a play that is strong in plot and weak on character development. Emotions are exaggerated. In everything else, there would be a clear distinction of good and bad, right and wrong. Melodrama makes life seem simpler than it is, and when we resort to it, we fall prey to lying rather than being truthful. In melodrama, evil is always punished, good is always rewarded. The outcome of the plot would easily be determined / known.
CHAPTER 1
1. The relationship between the history of theatre and the church did not come as a surprise. Theatre has always had an incredible amount of influence on the masses. Just check out its association with what I think, are the two most powerful man-made institutions in human history: Politics and Religion. For example, we see it being used as a devilishly effective political propaganda tool in the wickedly hilarious cabarets against Nazism in WWII and so many elaborate religious rituals (in my opinion, these are also theatrical forms) are performed to the masses. Note the responses and reactions of the masses to theatre involving politics and religion and you will see passion, fire, inspiration and life.
I strongly believe that if Christian theatre is done right, the potential to impact is going to be breathtaking.
I would love to know more about the history of theatre to build on failures and celebrate the successes. In knowing the history, we can also break new ground in contemporary Christian theatre.
2. "Entertainment" in the church should not be a dirty word. I believe God our Father never intends worship and praise to be boring either. As His children, we are called to enjoy Him and be satisfied in Him. I quote from John Piper in his book 'Desiring God': "God is most glorified when man is most satisfied." This is especially so in the 21st century, with so many gadgets to fill up our time, many people need to 'entertain' themselves and feel uncomfortable with boredom and stillness. To sum it up, our PM Lee Hsien Loong in his recent NDP rally speech was right: Short attention spans get shorter. This is a global phenomenon and everyone is more or less affected by this. The question is: How is the church going to respond and adapt to this? Total failure to even address this reality that we live in does seem rather bigoted to me.
Steve Pederson hit the nail on the head by saying that the word "Entertainment" needs defining when we come to talk about church drama. Personally, I will like to know more about the boundaries (e.g. Censorship) of Christian Drama and how the Christian artist copes with this curtailment of his artistic expression?
3. We were experimenting with Playback theatre during one of our rehearsals as a devising tool and the theme was personal history. After hearing a personal testimony from a girl in the group, we had to find a volunteer to act out a small portion of what the girl ahs shared. A chap called Justin simply stood up, walked to a corner of the stage area and sat down. The girl burst into tears immediately. Wow!
4. I do feel that believers are vulnerable and seek to understand God and themselves when worshipping at church -- only during traditional worship sessions. When Drama comes on, people do tend to sit back, fold their arms and think "Entertain me!"
So, I think in order to move drama on as a form of worship for the church, it has to be "Relevant", (and here comes the word again) "Entertaining" and "Participatory". Entertainment is important to draw the crowd in and get their attention; Relevance is crucial because like a sermon, it needs to address the needs of the congregation; Participation is useful in the application bit of it. When we hear a sermon, we say, "Amen!" and this is useful to let the pastor know that we are not folding our arms in apathy but rather listening intently. Let us have a bit of that kind of feedback in Drama Worship.
5. Willow Creek uses contemporary sketches to speak the language of the masses in today's context. Although the Bible is always relevant and contemporary to us, there are going to be cultural differences and most importantly, biblical sketches may have an 'overkill' effect: many people can already anticipate what is going to happen and they have all watched a 'Jonah and the Whale' and 'The Crucifixion of Christ' etc.
Although there is absolutely nothing wrong in using 'sketches' to share the gospel, we do also need to address the needs of Christians within our midst. Life is hard and we do need to explore 'Community Christian Theatre' as a form of ministry as well.
Sketches definitely have a place in today's fast-food culture (as mentioned earlier) but they remain fast-food. They are not all bad: they are affordable and does fill your stomach for a while. However, we cannot survive on fast-food all the time. It is not as savory, or satisfying as a carefully prepared meal with fresh ingredients that takes perhaps a few hours to prepare.
With the above analogy, I believe in Willow Creek's philosophy only to a certain extent. Sketches are easily digestible, needs fewer people to pull them off, fewer lines to remember and may help complement the pastor's message. But, a full length play is going to be 'satisfying and savory', where issues are not only scratched at the surface but dealt with on a deeper level and with this, leave a more lasting impression.
CHAPTER 2
6. Much as I would love to disagree with the statement, I have to acknowledge that drama does seem to be the “easiest” of the arts – at least on the entry level. Steve Pederson is right in saying that competency in this art form is hard to measure. I do not believe that drama is ‘high-brow’ stuff exclusive to only the very talented or trained. It is my belief that everyone can act: We have all lied; we put on masks on different occasions to deal with different people all the time. In fact, there are people who got so lost behind their masks that they do not know who they really are. Oh yes, everyone can act, just like everyone can stay afloat on water.
I prefer to see drama like reading the bible (I do hope that I am not being rude here!): It can be as easy as 1, 2, and 3 but can be as profound and deep as you want to take it. I shall use another analogy by likening it to playing the piano: you can play a decent “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star” and enthralled a group of infants and you can aspire to be Mozart. There is really no limit to how good you can get.
7. When the audience watches a well done piece of drama, they have empathized with the plot and characters. This shows their immersion into the piece and be vulnerable; opening their minds and hearts to follow the plot and feel for the characters.
I do not think it is a good compliment when the audience comes up to a director and says, “The temperature of the theatre is just right,” or “The actor’s costume looks expensive,” etc. If the audience is talking about everything apart from the plot and characters, then something is wrong. But of course, this excludes theatre-savvy practitioners with trained eyes,. This bunch of people spots the weirdest things.
8. I have always made it a point to learn and listen to critics and feedback. If I only have ears for praises, then I may get too puffed up and explode. Having critical feedback helps an artist grow and reflect.
People resist feedback because of 3 causes: they are either insecure or they are deluded or they are absolute geniuses. Let me first talk about the insecure ones: when one does not know who one really is, one tends to take feedback (any form of it) rather personally. They see it as a judgment of whether they are liked or disliked by the critic. This is hardly objective. For the second group consisting of deluded people, we see them all the time, especially more so in this day and age where children grow up without a ‘reality check’ on their ‘achievements’. Think about it: Parents these days are ever so quick to declare that they have a Picasso in the family when the child holds up a rough pencil sketch of a stick figure! What will happen to this child who will grow up in a sea of praises? Chances are, he/she will be deluded to the level of skills he/she possessed. We watch ‘American Idol’ on TV in horror as teenagers come into the set, totally believing that they can sing, and deliver croaks, squeaks and squawks. We need to give our children a reality check and tell them that “maybe Jake, you are better at something else apart from ballet dancing.” Last but not least, let us talk about the ‘absolute geniuses’. For example, if you have a chance to talk to Asian film director Wong Kar Wai and chide him for his eccentric style in directing his shows, he is going to… ignore you and carry on refining his eccentric style. I am not saying that he is an absolute genius but this is just an example. The truth of it is this: many of us do not understand absolute geniuses (even if they try to explain theories to us) and we leave it to them to make this world a better place. They may understand things we cannot fathom so it is best to leave them to do their job in their style.
A critique session is helpful only when you come away with some understanding of yourself.
9. Steve Pederson gets a High-Five from me on this part of the chapter! By sticking to “using drama to evangelize”, we are killing the craft and impact of drama. I have heard so many times of non-believers lamenting loudly that the play is ‘too preachy’; ‘this is typical Christian brainwashing’; “THEY have an agenda’ etc. You can bet that we are reaching out to them… negatively. Evangelism in drama is done too blatantly and has already become an ‘overkill’ decades ago. I have a confession to make: I am almost embarrassed to invite my non-believer friends to watch Christian drama these days. It has become all too familiar, predictable and unbearable to sit through.
10. I agree with Steve on the importance of ‘keeping it real’. He says, “Melodrama makes life simpler than it is, and when we resort to it, we fall prey to lying rather than being truthful.” To me, Melodrama cheapens the richness of the testimony and the message behind it by oversimplifying problems in life. When we bring the real picture to stage, there is going to be a lot of empathy and reflection. When the heart is open, then our good Lord can come in and minister to the individual.
11. There is always going to be a lot of pressure involved when you lead a church and pastors have the unenviable job of being sensitive to many people at the same time. Messages that are positive keep church members coming weekend after weekend because they get motivated and refreshed in the Lord. The truth is people generally do not like to change and hear the “downside of life”. Life is already hard for the laity and they are not likely to feel as good coming to a church that constantly ‘encourages’ its members to deal with teen suicide, the horror of AIDS or the growing epidemic in the inner city etc. I have always wondered if the church will be just as welcoming to a scantily-clad infamous prostitute as compared to a member of royalty if both decide to walk into church at the same time.
12. I more or less agree with the “Less is More” concept (no pun intended). While a ‘no gimmicks’ piece is always admirable, it does need very competent artistes to pull it off. The crux of the matter here is effectiveness and let us not get too romantic about the idea of returning to the basics per se. There are many tools in theatre that can be used to create an impact apart from good old fashioned ‘real’ acting. For example, if one is directing a play for youths, we may be looking at a more effective employment of movement and multimedia to hold their attention instead of acting. Yes, if that means we may have to provide a spectacle to grab them into the plot first, I will do it. The “Less or More” concept is, in my opinion, really subjected to the type of audience coming to the production.
This may come as a surprise to you given what I have just said but I am abit of a purist when it comes to good drama: the standard of acting must not be compromised and the story kept simple (‘less is more’ concept). But I believe that a “marriage” of using a simple story and believable characters and at the same time making the production visually captivating is perfectly all right. The audience appreciates an elaborate set and captivating visuals and is going to feel that they are valued.
My Quote!! : YES I AGREE!!! From Chapter 1, “A good sketch creates a high degree of audience identification. While biblical sketches can be effective, we are strong proponents of contemporary drama that reflects the real world, the world people live in. this is the kind of drama that has the potential for the most identification. The goal is to raise questions and create tension without giving answers.”
CHAPTER 1
2. After reading this chapter, what are your thoughts about “entertainment” in the church?
I think that drama should not be labeled “entertainment” in a church context. Maybe drama ministry should be labeled “gospel-tainment”, so as to get the drama is entertainment which equates to “cheap, glitzy and worldly” out of people’s wrong conception of drama ministry! At the same time, I also think that drama should be done as much as possible to bring up the atmosphere before the sermon is presented. I quote from Pederson, “ Good drama can bring out wholesome laughter and move us deeply”, as the saying goes, “actions speaks louder than words”. It is easier for a person to watch a sketch than hearing a story. And drama is definitely a good channel to the people!
CHAPTER 2
6. Do you agree that drama seems the "easiest" of the arts. Why?
I totally DO NOT AGREE that drama seems to be the “easiest” of the arts.
I have been in some different sketches and they are definitely not easy jobs! I have taken up different responsibility before, from a small role with no lines to remember, to a lead role with a lot of lines to remember, to writing the script for a sketch. Different roles fulfill different responsibilities. The small role I was involved in requires me to remember no lines, however, when roles includes no lines, facial expressions will have to be better exaggerated in order for the audience to know who this character is and what has to be portrayed. However, thank God I had good feedback for that. A lead role is also not the easiest job to take up. Other than the many lines to remember, the facial expressions, the stage awareness, the projection of the voice when no mike is given, the improvisation when my co-actress forgot her lines or when I forgot my lines are the things that I had to deal with. Other than the front line of drama I had mentioned, I have also experienced what is it like to write a sketch and to produce the sketch. That means to cough out a story and script, then have practice with the actors, teach them stage awareness, brainstorm on the stage presentation, getting rehearsal going on, making sure my actors know what they are supposed to do. Although I wouldn’t say these productions are huge ones. But I absolutely do not agree that drama is something that you can come out with in just 2-3 hours. So, who said drama is the easiest of the arts?!?!
8. Have you ever sought feedback or critique of your dramatic work? Did it help you? How? Why do people resist or not seek feedback?
Yes I have. However, I do not have the blessings of having someone with much experience to give me feedback on my dramatic work. The feedbacks I collected were from people I know, whom, by the way, might just be giving the positive comments just not to hurt my feelings. However, I have gotten some feedback from friends who are drama students. And they are the ones I have learnt from, and then pass the knowledge down to my team whom I work with
The positive feedbacks did really boost my confidence level up. They helped me to build that self-esteem to do another production with better confidence, and perhaps a bigger role/responsibility. The constructive feedbacks (I choose to see those as constructive and not negative) gave me a chance to be aware of what are the things I forgot or looked over. And from there, I can improve on it and be able to do a better job next time.
I guess people resist feedback when they see negative feedbacks as negative feedbacks, which means, they might not see them as constructive feedbacks. With the perspective of seeing those feedbacks as negatives, it is more likely to be put down by the feedbacks. They will most probably be demoralized by those feedbacks and might also think that they are not “cut out” to act or produce. It might also lower their self-confidence. Thus, there will be a chance that they will not want to move forward to take on greater responsibilities, or worse still might just give up on working on dramatic works altogether.
Complete this sentence: "A critique session is helpful only when you come away with some understanding of what caused a problem."
12. What is your opinion of the “Less is More” concept?
I guess, for myself, I love to watch sketches that are right to the basics of life. Just a few actors and simple storyline that speaks right to my heart is so much better than large-scale productions that have all the special effects and fancy stuffs. However, it is not like I hate large-scale productions like this, but sometimes, it’s the simplest of things that really catch people’s heart as they are not distracted by the special effects and concentrate on the storyline. And not to forget that spiritual side of it, that God can use anything to speak to people’s heart. We are just a channel for Him to use.
My CHAPTER 2...
6. Much as I would love to disagree with the statement, I have to acknowledge that drama does seem to be the “easiest” of the arts – at least on the entry level. Steve Pederson is right in saying that competency in this art form is hard to measure. I do not believe that drama is ‘high-brow’ stuff exclusive to only the very talented or trained. It is my belief that everyone can act: We have all lied; we put on masks on different occasions to deal with different people all the time. In fact, there are people who got so lost behind their masks that they do not know who they really are. Oh yes, everyone can act, just like everyone can stay afloat on water.
I prefer to see drama like reading the bible (I do hope that I am not being rude here!): It can be as easy as 1, 2, and 3 but can be as profound and deep as you want to take it. I shall use another analogy by likening it to playing the piano: you can play a decent “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star” and enthralled a group of infants and you can aspire to be Mozart. There is really no limit to how good you can get.
7. When the audience watches a well done piece of drama, they have empathized with the plot and characters. This shows their immersion into the piece and be vulnerable; opening their minds and hearts to follow the plot and feel for the characters.
I do not think it is a good compliment when the audience comes up to a director and says, “The temperature of the theatre is just right,” or “The actor’s costume looks expensive,” etc. If the audience is talking about everything apart from the plot and characters, then something is wrong. But of course, this excludes theatre-savvy practitioners with trained eyes,. This bunch of people spots the weirdest things.
8. I have always made it a point to learn and listen to critics and feedback. If I only have ears for praises, then I may get too puffed up and explode. Having critical feedback helps an artist grow and reflect.
People resist feedback because of 3 causes: they are either insecure or they are deluded or they are absolute geniuses. Let me first talk about the insecure ones: when one does not know who one really is, one tends to take feedback (any form of it) rather personally. They see it as a judgment of whether they are liked or disliked by the critic. This is hardly objective. For the second group consisting of deluded people, we see them all the time, especially more so in this day and age where children grow up without a ‘reality check’ on their ‘achievements’. Think about it: Parents these days are ever so quick to declare that they have a Picasso in the family when the child holds up a rough pencil sketch of a stick figure! What will happen to this child who will grow up in a sea of praises? Chances are, he/she will be deluded to the level of skills he/she possessed. We watch ‘American Idol’ on TV in horror as teenagers come into the set, totally believing that they can sing, and deliver croaks, squeaks and squawks. We need to give our children a reality check and tell them that “maybe Jake, you are better at something else apart from ballet dancing.” Last but not least, let us talk about the ‘absolute geniuses’. For example, if you have a chance to talk to Asian film director Wong Kar Wai and chide him for his eccentric style in directing his shows, he is going to… ignore you and carry on refining his eccentric style. I am not saying that he is an absolute genius but this is just an example. The truth of it is this: many of us do not understand absolute geniuses (even if they try to explain theories to us) and we leave it to them to make this world a better place. They may understand things we cannot fathom so it is best to leave them to do their job in their style.
A critique session is helpful only when you come away with some understanding of yourself.
9. Steve Pederson gets a High-Five from me on this part of the chapter! By sticking to “using drama to evangelize”, we are killing the craft and impact of drama. I have heard so many times of non-believers lamenting loudly that the play is ‘too preachy’; ‘this is typical Christian brainwashing’; “THEY have an agenda’ etc. You can bet that we are reaching out to them… negatively. Evangelism in drama is done too blatantly and has already become an ‘overkill’ decades ago. I have a confession to make: I am almost embarrassed to invite my non-believer friends to watch Christian drama these days. It has become all too familiar, predictable and unbearable to sit through.
10. I agree with Steve on the importance of ‘keeping it real’. He says, “Melodrama makes life simpler than it is, and when we resort to it, we fall prey to lying rather than being truthful.” To me, Melodrama cheapens the richness of the testimony and the message behind it by oversimplifying problems in life. When we bring the real picture to stage, there is going to be a lot of empathy and reflection. When the heart is open, then our good Lord can come in and minister to the individual.
11. There is always going to be a lot of pressure involved when you lead a church and pastors have the unenviable job of being sensitive to many people at the same time. Messages that are positive keep church members coming weekend after weekend because they get motivated and refreshed in the Lord. The truth is people generally do not like to change and hear the “downside of life”. Life is already hard for the laity and they are not likely to feel as good coming to a church that constantly ‘encourages’ its members to deal with teen suicide, the horror of AIDS or the growing epidemic in the inner city etc. I have always wondered if the church will be just as welcoming to a scantily-clad infamous prostitute as compared to a member of royalty if both decide to walk into church at the same time.
12. I more or less agree with the “Less is More” concept (no pun intended). While a ‘no gimmicks’ piece is always admirable, it does need very competent artistes to pull it off. The crux of the matter here is effectiveness and let us not get too romantic about the idea of returning to the basics per se. There are many tools in theatre that can be used to create an impact apart from good old fashioned ‘real’ acting. For example, if one is directing a play for youths, we may be looking at a more effective employment of movement and multimedia to hold their attention instead of acting. Yes, if that means we may have to provide a spectacle to grab them into the plot first, I will do it. The “Less or More” concept is, in my opinion, really subjected to the type of audience coming to the production.
This may come as a surprise to you given what I have just said but I am abit of a purist when it comes to good drama: the standard of acting must not be compromised and the story kept simple (‘less is more’ concept). But I believe that a “marriage” of using a simple story and believable characters and at the same time making the production visually captivating is perfectly all right. The audience appreciates an elaborate set and captivating visuals and is going to feel that they are valued.
Puay Hong aka Lina
"Drama works best when it reflects life in all its pain and wonder. Too often, Christian writers preach or try to make a point in a heavy-handed manner." "When Christians talk about "using drama to evangelize" or "drama with a message", they are actually abusing the art form"
"Oh, I have never thought of it like that. In fact, I always have this idea that drama is a good form to "preach" and "reach out to the unsaved". This is a fresh idea to me.
From : Puay Hong aka Lina
Date : 5 Sep
Drama works best when it reflects in all its pain and wonder. Too often, Christian writers preach or try to make a point in a heavy-handed manner.
When Christians talk about “using drama to evangelize” or “drama with a message”, they are actually abusing the art.
Oh! I have never thought of it like that. In fact, I fall in the category of those who “talk about using drama to evangelize”.
CHAPTER 1
5. Why does Willow Creek Community Church use contemporary sketches rather than Biblical sketches? Have you ever seen a sketch in worship that didn't "share the gospel?" What are your opinions about the Willow Creek philosophy?
Willow Creek Community Church is a strong proponent of contemporary sketches. I think because contemporary drama reflects the real world and gives the potential for most identification. Whereas Biblical sketches are more of “story-telling”. Yes, I have seen a sketch in worship that didn’t “share the gospel”. It is about a couple who didn’t have time for each other and they even have to book an appointment to talk to each other. Personally, I do not identify with the sketch (because I am not in the situation). However I do hear some feedback from some of the church members that it is a powerful illustration. It is true that the drama gives the pastor a good platform to speak on the issues of marriage and bring in the biblical perspective.
CHAPTER 2
7. What happens to the audience when watching a well done drama. Why?
I would like to talk about what happens to the audience when the drama is badly done first. At least for me when the drama is badly done, I will be criticizing the poor acting which is not convincing. And if it is a lousy plot or story, I will be wondering why I am wasting my time watching this thrash. I do not enjoy it and I do not gain any insight or anything out from it.
When a drama is well done, I will be touched by the story and what happened to the characters. I will also keep thinking of the story and the meaning behind the story. In fact, I will forget about the very good acting. I would have taken for granted the good acting as if the character is the real person. I will be totally drawn into it. I believe that the audience would too.
9. What does Steve Pederson mean by "Abusing the Art Form"?
Actually I really do have a new perspective when I read these 2 chapters. I have always felt that drama is a good form of “evangelism”. It is able to bring the gospel to the audience in an “entertaining” manner. I must admit that sometimes I do intend to make it too obvious and “heavy-handed” (as the actual words from the author) for the audience. I have never really thought that sometimes it is not necessary to “preach” in the drama.
I think what Steve Pederson meant is that drama was never meant to replace the preacher. Drama should be kept as an art form. There should be a distinction between art and message.
12. What is your opinion of the "Less is More" concept?
The first time I heard this phrase was from my mime lesson from Christina Seargent (Mime Unlimited). Because in mime, we cannot talk and can only express through our actions and facial expressions, we intend to try to exaggerate and make it more obvious. We think that it is more “entertaining” and more “real”. However in the end, it was over-doing. It reminds me of a Chinese saying “To draw the feet of the snake” – meaning that we are adding things which are not necessary and in fact will spoil the whole picture. She kept telling us “Less is more”. This has made me more aware of my own acting – whether I am over-acting or am I being real.
This is the second context which I see this phrase. When I am reading this passage, it reminds me of the very first Christmas performance I did in indoor stadium about the life of Jesus Christ. It was a huge cast with almost hundreds of dancers, actors, singers and musicians. This was not including the lighting, visual, audio and stage managers etc. We had lots of props as well. It was a grand performance and I believe that many were touched by it. In fact I have a good friend who brought her parents to the show and they were touched and accepted the Lord subsequently.
I believe that there is a time for grand performances and there is a time for simple sketches. Both of them play different roles. Grand performances will attract crowds who just want some entertainment (just like going for a concert) and this is an opportunity to tell them the gospel. Whereas the simple contemporary sketches on real life stories will touch the hearts of both Christians and pre-Christians. They will be able to identify with the stories. It opens the hearts and prepares them to hear the words from the preacher.
Aside, I just got reminded again of a drama performance I watched in a Russian church. There were many props with many “animals” on stage. Everyone was having a good time watching the different “animals” and the sea waves etc. There wasn’t much of acting. It was like a big carnival with the display of the different props and “animals. It was fun to watch but I must admit that it was forgettable (I cannot even remember the storyline) and it does not impact lives. It was pure fun entertainment.
A person doesn't necessarily need a theatre degree, but some courses in directing and acting, possibly playwrighting, will prove very helpful.
"Yes, I agree!"
Chapter 1
2) After reading this chapter, what are your thoughts about "entertainment" in the church?
It's true that some churches think that drama is merely about entertainment. It somehow connects with the world too much that it's not a good thing to bring into the church. However, I disagree with that. I feel that drama besides entertaining it actually bring forth a lot of truth and touches hearts in a very direct way.
It all voice down to the script used and the message, which we are trying to send out. It's not the wordly kind of entertainment but one with lots of communications.
3)Do you have a personal example of the power of drama to break down personal defenses? Tell us about it.
A few years ago, my church did a drama called "The Eternity". It's a series of stories, which depicts life of different people in this society. The play was about abortion, suicidal, sudden death and failure in life.
Basically, the script was simple, with no twists and turns. People came to watch, as the stories unfold one after another, it was able to speak volume to different hearts during a difficult time of their lives. People were able to identify with it.
Personally, I invited a friend of mine for this drama. She had gone through an abortion without telling her family and friends. When she saw the play about a girl having to go through an abortion because of failed relationships. She just broke down; it spoke deep into her heart. She was filled with regret, guilt and shame.
Chapter 2
10)How does the author describe Melodrama?
Melodrama was generally connotes as a play that is strong on plot but weak on character development. Emotions are too exaggerated. There is a clear distinction between good and bad, right and wrong. It is not the real picture, because it does not into account the "gray" areas of life, rather it reduces life to its simplest, most basic form.
In Melodrama, evil is always punished, good is always rewarded. However, it doesn't work that way in the real world. In reality, the innocent do suffer and the evil ones do go unpunished.
12)What is your opinion of the "Less is More" concept?
Having seen lots of elaborated productions, which have strong casts, special effects and costumes, they are definitely very entertaining and enthralling. But it rarely does any transformation in the life of people.
I feel that drama can still have a very powerful impact with simple story lines and truth. Story lines that are real and truthful can sink deeply into the heart of the people. It can have a more lasting and dynamic effects than any special effects done in an elaborated production.
Hence, I do agree with the "Less is More" concept still stand strongly in drama today.
A person doesn't necessarily need a theatre degree, but some courses in directing and acting, possibly playwrighting, will prove very helpful.
"Yes, I agree!"
Chapter 1
2) After reading this chapter, what are your thoughts about "entertainment" in the church?
It's true that some churches think that drama is merely about entertainment. It somehow connects with the world too much that it's not a good thing to bring into the church. However, I disagree with that. I feel that drama besides entertaining it actually bring forth a lot of truth and touches hearts in a very direct way.
It all voice down to the script used and the message, which we are trying to send out. It's not the wordly kind of entertainment but one with lots of communications.
3)Do you have a personal example of the power of drama to break down personal defenses? Tell us about it.
A few years ago, my church did a drama called "The Eternity". It's a series of stories, which depicts life of different people in this society. The play was about abortion, suicidal, sudden death and failure in life.
Basically, the script was simple, with no twists and turns. People came to watch, as the stories unfold one after another, it was able to speak volume to different hearts during a difficult time of their lives. People were able to identify with it.
Personally, I invited a friend of mine for this drama. She had gone through an abortion without telling her family and friends. When she saw the play about a girl having to go through an abortion because of failed relationships. She just broke down; it spoke deep into her heart. She was filled with regret, guilt and shame.
Chapter 2
10)How does the author describe Melodrama?
Melodrama was generally connotes as a play that is strong on plot but weak on character development. Emotions are too exaggerated. There is a clear distinction between good and bad, right and wrong. It is not the real picture, because it does not into account the "gray" areas of life, rather it reduces life to its simplest, most basic form.
In Melodrama, evil is always punished, good is always rewarded. However, it doesn't work that way in the real world. In reality, the innocent do suffer and the evil ones do go unpunished.
12)What is your opinion of the "Less is More" concept?
Having seen lots of elaborated productions, which have strong casts, special effects and costumes, they are definitely very entertaining and enthralling. But it rarely does any transformation in the life of people.
I feel that drama can still have a very powerful impact with simple story lines and truth. Story lines that are real and truthful can sink deeply into the heart of the people. It can have a more lasting and dynamic effects than any special effects done in an elaborated production.
Hence, I do agree with the "Less is More" concept still stand strongly in drama today.
After reading the Forward and Chapter 1 & 2 of DRAMA MINISTRY, by Steve Pederson, comment by quoting a passage that made you say, "YES! I AGREE!" or "OH, I never thought of it like that." (at least 1 sentence)
To quote Steven Pederson, Chapter 1 of Drama Ministry, “… drama that creates identification can break through those defences. Drama stirs our memories, probes our psyches, and exposes our pain. It has the potential to create a ‘lump in the throat’ kind of recognition. To that, I say “Yes! I agree!”.
CHAPTER 1
1. What did you learn about the history of theatre & the church. Would you like to know more about it?
It is intriguing to discover that drama in the church began as early in tenth century Roman Catholic Church and has a rich history since. The incorporation of drama in the church has gone through rough patches in different eras, much attributed to being contrary to the present day political system and increasingly perceived as secular. In the twenty-first century, church drama is resurrecting in a higher quality approach which appeals more to contemporary audiences, gaining regard again as a significant form of artistic expression longside in communicating the message of the gospel.
I certainly would like to know more about it for its rich heritage and how it shapes the future of the relationship between the comtemporary church and theatre.
CHAPTER 2
7. What happens to the audience when watching a well done drama. Why?
According to Steve Pederson, when drama is well done, one is never conscious of the actor or the director’s skill, rather one simply believes what is being seen is real.
It fulfills the primary purpose of church drama in relating to the reality of the audience’s experiences, identifying with the issues they are facing in daily life and come to see the sketch as virtual reflection of themselves in the real world.
9. What does Steve Pederson mean by "Abusing the Art Form"?
First, the author made a purist distinction between ‘playwrights’ and ‘evangelists’. The forte of the dramatist is bringing out the situation and character while the evangelist is of preaching the the message of the gospel. He remains that each are best at their own strengths alone and artists would not be effective trying to fulfill both roles at the same time.
Secondly, trying to gear the direction of a drama to convey a certain perspective will also undermine it to a melodrama. This which causes the drama to lose its identification with the audience and distance itself to the realities they relate to everyday life.
10. How does the author describe Melodrama?
Steve Pederson described ‘Melodrama’ as a term which connotes “a play that is strong on plot and weak on character development. Emotions are exaggerated. There is a clear distinction between good and bad, right and wrong.”
The author relates that in context of certain church dramas which depicts life appearing simpler than it really is, where good always triumphs over evil and does not take into account of areas which may be grey. In short, he explains that melodramas in church dramas does not identify and address real life issues of the laity.
RUTH's reaction
Yes! I agree to what Steve Pederson mentioned about the power of drama and shared his opinions on why drama’s opinion is unrealized.
Chapter 1
Q2. After reading this chapter, what are your thoughts about “entertainment” in the church?
I completely agreed with Pederson that people who opposed to the idea of having drama in church is because they felt that it is just entertainment and that the church should just concentrate on saving souls. I personally agreed that drama is a form of entertainment but we can use this form of entertainment to reach out to the pre-believers. I shared that same sentimental as Pederson that drama can bring out the truth and that good drama not only bring out wholesome laughter but is also able to move us.
In my opinion, for those who agreed that drama can be only be used in churches with contemporary edge and shouldn’t be part of traditional worship experience simply because worship and entertainment, are people who are too legalistic and rigid.
We are living in the twenty-first century let us not focus on the minor but concentrate our energy in dispensing the Gospel to the people around us. The Gospel stays the same, we are simply presenting it in the many different ways.
Q5. Why does Willow Creek Community Church use contemporary sketches rather than Biblical sketches? Have you ever seen a sketch in worship that didn’t share the gospel?” What are your opinions about the Willow Creek philosophy?
The reason why Willow Creek Community Church uses contemporary sketches rather than Biblical sketches because contemporary drama reflects the real world, the world we live in. This kind of drama has the potential for the most identification which will often break down defenses. Good drama are able to stirs our memories, probes our psyches, and exposes us. It simply reveals to us afresh, just how far we fall short. No, personally I have not seen a sketch in worship that did not share the Gospel; which is great because we must make use of every opportunity to reach out the pre-believers. Personally, I agreed with Willow Creek’s philosophy – using contemporary drama to reach out to the community. In order to reach out to the community, we must first let them know that we understand the challenges that they are going through that is to identify with them and then presenting our way of getting through these challenges with God. We just have to be creative to employ different ways of presenting the Gospel to the world.
Chapter 2
Q9. What does Steve Pederson mean by “Abusing the Art Form”?
When Pederson wrote about people “abusing the art form”, he meant it for Christians who talk about “using drama to evangelize” or “drama with a message”. The author wrote that good drama does not preach. Drama should help people get in touch with an issue or problem and thus build a platform for the pastor to bring a biblical perspective to that issue. Another way of abusing the art form is when the drama “push” to convey a certain perspective and end up with a “melodrama”.
Q10. How does the author describe Melodrama?
Pederson described “Melodrama” as a play that is strong on plot and weak on character development. Emotions are exaggerated and there is a clear distinction between the good and the bad, right and wrong.
Q12. What is your opinion of the “Less is More” concept?
In my opinion the “Less is More” concept is true. If we are not careful when doing our production especially for big production we will fall into the trap very easily. Therefore, we have to be very conscious about not only doing “Christian entertainment” in a positive way but also to focus on simply story line, to establish real believable characters as there is way the real power of drama lies.
Post a Comment